|
History/current position · In 2008 Countryside approached the HRA and other parties to explore bids for taking over the freehold and thus responsibility of running the leisure centre and maintaining the open spaces · The recession removed any interest by other parties · It also prevented Countryside paying the dowry necessary for residents to maintain the land and thus complete the transaction · HRA has become increasingly concerned about the escalating costs and seemingly poor management of the club · The HRA has investigated and established the case for transfer and continued to pursue a means to effect this. · At the same time and recognising the difficulties and time transfer might take, HRA has instigated a ‘Target £1000’ to improve efficiencies and control costs with the objective of securing an annual rent charge of circa £1000
Why effect a transfer? · We need to protect the value of our properties: · Well run and affordable, the open spaces, setting and amenities will add up to £50K to our properties – Christopher Russell · People move here because of the club · Without control and badly run, costs escalate and the opposite is true · Owning the land removes the threat and uncertainty of any development proposals · We control our future rather than face the inevitability of uncontrolled cost increases in the event of a major unforeseen expenditure
What are the options?
Do nothing · If Countryside don’t transfer, strong possibility that maintenance will deteriorate, costs increase and club will become a financial liability · Countryside sell club &/or land to someone else. Unlikely but makes the future uncertain. We take it over · Transfer negotiated poorly or run badly worse off & becomes a liability! · Transfer negotiated well and run well everyone is better off
How do we ensure success?
Requirements for a successful transfer · Financially advantageous · Legally sound
Structuring the new company or trust to meet our needs. · Financial stability · Legally watertight · Improve service to all residents at lower costs · A positive asset when selling your house · Exit strategy in the event of exceptional circumstances
Obstacles to the transfer
· Countryside will not transfer the club or grounds separately · Whilst unable to currently pay the dowry Countryside are preparing an option to agree the dowry sum sufficient to maintain the land in perpetuity. · Transfer of the club and land will take place subject to Countryside maintaining the land themselves at their expense until the dowry can be paid
Preparation for the transfer
· HRA has completed a detailed breakdown and analysis of income and proposed running costs to establish viability of running a new residents’ · management company · A previous bid will be the basis of new negotiations · Transfer of residents liability to pay to new company. · Legal enforcement of payment · Interest added for non payment · All legal fees of transfer paid by Countryside
Requirements for land transfer
· Detailed breakdown and analysis of annual maintenance and other costs (PL insurance etc) based on 3 quotations · A ‘dowry’ sufficient to yield amount to cover this and any anticipated costs · All legal fees paid · Legal responsibility accepted by Countryside for any future legal challenge relating to the transfer
Key Prospective Benefits
· We control the future · Protected from risk of further building · Separate club and open space · Improved maintenance of land · Control of annual rent charge · Club becomes an asset · Remove obstacles to selling house · No additional liability
Summary
· The work we have done and the proposed structure ensures improved running of both the club and land · Target £1000 introduces a focus for management for the first time · Club fees will be less over time than under alternative ownership · Holding shares in HRA Ltd does not create any liability · You can refuse your share/s but by doing so you forgo any say in the running of either the estate or club · Shares will only be re offered on the sale of a property · Compulsory members rent charge is payable regardless of share uptake |


